Skip to main content

Earthworks



            The Earthworks represent a crucially important development in sculpture that rivals the importance of both found object and performative sculpture. Each brings much to offer to the world of sculpture, but often the Earthworks are overshadowed by other sculptures that are easier to exhibit or record. The result is that such large scale works like those of Robert Smithson has been left out of the main focus of discussion around sculpture, largely because of the difficulty in experiencing such sites and constructs that defy the traditional museum space.
            Earthworks challenge what sculpture can be both in sheer scale and basic form. By creating such large-scale works, the sculptors open a conversation about what it means to create sculpture and space. The experience of an Earthwork usually revolves not around looking at an object, but existing in or on forms and spaces made by altering the earth. They become vaguely architectural, too large to be conventional museum experiences, challenging our ideas of what it means to experience art.
            The art world and everyday life can be looked at from a different perspective through the Earthworks by making us consider details we would otherwise neglect. When considering massive, carved into the landscape work, a vast variety of topics ranging from archeology to the built environment. We look at earthworks as we would monuments from past civilizations or chance geological features that appear intentional. By studying and experiencing such artwork we become interested in how it relates to the everyday, how something so massive and seemingly out of the ordinary is in fact much like the environments encountered regularly.
            Possibly the most important discussion raised by Earthworks is the broad idea of human impact on the world, both physical alterations and effects of other activities, like pollution and abandoned sites. It is made blatantly obvious that humans enact change on their surroundings, and that we will and have gone to extreme measures to carve out spaces we inhabit and use. Connections can be drawn to open pit quarries and mines, roadways that cut along or even bore through the landscape, and cities that alter geology to an almost unrecognizable form. They create an undeniable sense of alteration, almost that humanity shouldn’t pursue such drastic measures, but simultaneously suggests that such massive alterations will be the only lasting record, as the individual becomes dwarfed by such spaces.
            Overall these sculptures offer a shift in perspective that has defined them in the history of sculpture. While it did not bring about a permanent shift in the way sculpture is created, they represent an important body of work committed to the creation of spaces for reflection and contemplation. Unlike a large majority of sculpture, the viewer inhabits and experiences the art as part of it, not as an alienated observer meant to exist in a sterile environment.

#hadpratt, #hadsopratt, #hadstories, #hadhistoryofsculpture

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jean Tinguely

Heureka 1963 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heureka_(Plastik)#/media/File:Z%C3%BCrich_-_Seefeld_-_Heureka_IMG_0055.JPG Jean Tinguely's first publicly exhibited work, titled “Heureka”, is an excellent example of the "do-nothing machine" approach to kinetic sculpture, with oscillating, revolving, and reciprocating components pushing and pulling on one another in a complex rhythm. This embodies the spirit of machinery, in that often the intention and function of real machinery is obscured by its complex physical configuration. Various components of machinery are used in this assembly, mostly wheels and pulleys, that link to each other with belts and mechanical shafts supported in bearings. The various mechanisms are supported on a frame composed of structural steel beams, rods, and sections of railway track. Interlacing of supporting struts and various moving components references many industrial structures such as oil pumps, large engines, or gantry cranes...

Women in Sculpture

                The history of sculpture has been largely dominated by male artists largely because of the presumption that sculpture is messy and requires physical strength. This in a way is a leftover sentiment from when most sculpture was either carved stone or cast metal. Both processes, by nature of their perceived requirements of physical strength from the artists, were considered unladylike. This is of course not true, as women like Claudel clearly proved. Prejudiced views that women, due to lack of strength and resilience, could not work in such a demanding medium as sculpture lead to exclusion even after it has been made clear gender is irrelevant in such matters.             Another obstacle was the subject matter of sculpture, which has been focused on depiction of the figure for quite a long time. Such figures were largely female, idealized...

Validity of Historical Sculpture

Hand-colored lithograph by Day & Son. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.             While still wrapped up in the continuous desire to depart from the past and define itself as a new age, the 21 st century must grapple with the precedents set and philosophies solidified by past movements just as much, if not more so, than previous centuries. To effectively reconcile ourselves with the past, we must not simply disregard it, or look upon it with the removed, passive eye afforded to us by our position in time. We must empathize with the struggles and uncertainties express by those who lived through historic events, as often the struggles of their day are in fact still our own today.             Thus, past sculpture should not be looked at as something that is invalidated by its place in history, made irrelevant and trivial by our ability to see with historical hindsight. For e...